Zcash (ZEC) Shielded Transactions Review 2026
Here’s something that caught me off guard: privacy-focused cryptocurrency usage jumped to 20-25% of total circulating supply in 2026. One particular digital asset led this charge. That’s not some niche corner of the crypto world anymore—billions of dollars now move through encrypted channels.
I’ve spent years watching this space evolve, and honestly? The transformation has been remarkable. What started as theoretical cryptographic privacy became a legitimate alternative to transparent blockchain systems.
The technology behind Zcash (ZEC) shielded transactions uses something called zero-knowledge proofs. Basically, you can verify payment information without actually seeing it.
The numbers tell an interesting story. Market capitalization hit $6.22 billion, surpassing competitors I thought were untouchable. Price performance showed 148% weekly gains reaching $227.44 back in October 2025.
But here’s what matters more than the price action: institutional players are actually using this technology now.
This Zcash 2026 review isn’t gonna hype you into anything. Instead, I’m walking you through what works, what doesn’t, and why ZEC privacy features matter today. I’ve looked at the technical architecture, market data, and real-world adoption patterns.
What I found surprised me—and it might surprise you too.
Key Takeaways
- Privacy adoption reached 20-25% of circulating supply by 2026, marking a significant shift in user behavior toward encrypted payment systems
- Market valuation achieved $6.22 billion, overtaking major competitors in the privacy cryptocurrency sector
- Zero-knowledge proof technology enables transaction verification without exposing payment details or sender information
- Institutional adoption increased substantially throughout 2025-2026, indicating mainstream acceptance of privacy-preserving blockchain technology
- Price momentum demonstrated 148% weekly gains with values reaching $227.44 in late 2025
- Regulatory compliance integration allows privacy features to coexist with institutional requirements
- Technical architecture balances encryption strength with blockchain integrity and network performance
Understanding Zcash and Its Privacy Features
The cryptocurrency landscape has been searching for a privacy solution that balances user control with regulatory compliance. Zcash might be that answer. After spending months testing different privacy coins, I’ve found that Zcash offers something unique: the freedom to choose your privacy level.
This flexibility isn’t just a technical feature. It’s what’s kept Zcash relevant while other privacy-focused cryptocurrencies faced regulatory pressure and exchange delistings.
What makes Zcash stand out isn’t just its privacy capabilities. It’s the way the technology integrates sophisticated cryptography with practical usability. Most privacy coins force you to choose between complete anonymity or complete transparency.
Zcash gives you both options in the same ecosystem.
What is Zcash (ZEC)?
Zcash launched in October 2016 with a mission that seemed almost contradictory at the time. The goal was to create a cryptocurrency with Bitcoin’s proven economic model but add optional privacy features. The project came from cryptographers and scientists who weren’t satisfied with Bitcoin’s transparent blockchain.
The economics mirror Bitcoin deliberately. Zcash has a 21 million coin supply cap with halvings every four years. This familiar structure helped early adoption since investors already understood the scarcity model.
Zcash made one significant technical improvement—block times of 75 seconds instead of Bitcoin’s 10 minutes.
That faster block time means transactions confirm much quicker. I typically see confirmations within a few minutes rather than waiting around for half an hour. It’s a small change that makes a huge difference in practical usage.
- Hybrid privacy model: Users choose between transparent and shielded transactions based on their needs
- Exchange compatibility: Optional privacy keeps Zcash listed on major platforms like Coinbase and Binance
- Proven cryptography: Uses peer-reviewed zero-knowledge proofs rather than experimental privacy methods
- Active development: Regular network upgrades improve both privacy and performance
The Zcash blockchain technology operates on a proof-of-work consensus mechanism, similar to Bitcoin. Miners secure the network and validate transactions. What’s different is how the blockchain handles transaction data.
It can either display everything publicly or encrypt the details completely.
According to current market data, about 85% of Zcash transactions use transparent addresses. About 15-25% utilize shielded features. That might sound like low privacy adoption, but it’s actually strategic.
The transparent vs shielded Zcash approach lets the network maintain regulatory compliance while offering genuine privacy.
How Shielded Transactions Work
Let me break down the technology behind Zcash’s privacy features without getting too deep into mathematics. Shielded transactions rely on something called zk-SNARKs technology. That stands for zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge.
The concept behind zero-knowledge proofs is actually elegant. Imagine proving you know a password without ever revealing the password itself. That’s essentially what zk-SNARKs do for transactions.
They prove a transaction is valid without exposing who sent it, who received it, or how much transferred.
Zcash uses two types of addresses that work fundamentally differently:
- Transparent addresses (T-addresses): Start with “t” and function like Bitcoin addresses with full blockchain visibility
- Shielded addresses (Z-addresses): Start with “z” and encrypt transaction details using zero-knowledge proofs
You can send Zcash from one shielded address to another fully shielded address. The transaction details get encrypted on the blockchain. Observers can see that a transaction occurred, but they can’t determine the sender, receiver, or amount.
The network still validates everything is legitimate. It just does so without revealing the private information.
The mathematics involves elliptic curve cryptography and polynomial commitments. I won’t pretend I can explain the full technical implementation without pulling up research papers. What matters practically is that this cryptography has been peer-reviewed by academic cryptographers.
It’s been tested in real-world conditions since 2016.
| Transaction Type | Privacy Level | Network Support | Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| T-to-T Address | No privacy (fully public) | All wallets and exchanges | Exchange trading, merchant payments |
| T-to-Z Address | Receiver hidden | Most modern wallets | Receiving private payments |
| Z-to-Z Address | Full privacy (all details encrypted) | Advanced wallets only | Maximum financial privacy |
| Z-to-T Address | Sender hidden | Most modern wallets | Converting to public funds |
Modern Zcash wallets have made shielded transactions surprisingly user-friendly. You don’t need to understand the cryptography to use it. The wallet handles the complex mathematics behind the scenes.
It’s similar to how you don’t need to understand TCP/IP protocols to browse the internet.
Comparison with Other Cryptocurrencies
I’ve tested most major privacy coins. Zcash occupies a unique position in the market. It’s not trying to be the most private cryptocurrency.
It’s trying to be the most flexible privacy solution that still works within regulatory frameworks.
Bitcoin represents complete transparency. Every transaction is permanently recorded on a public ledger with visible amounts, addresses, and transaction history. That transparency was intentional in Bitcoin’s design, but it creates significant privacy concerns.
Anyone can analyze your entire financial history if they link your identity to a Bitcoin address.
Monero sits at the opposite extreme with mandatory privacy on every transaction. Amounts, senders, and receivers are all obscured through ring signatures and stealth addresses. This maximum privacy approach is powerful.
It’s also why Monero faced delistings from major exchanges like Binance and Kraken in various jurisdictions.
Zcash found middle ground. The transparent vs shielded Zcash model lets users select their privacy level based on context. Need to prove transaction history for taxes or audits?
Use transparent addresses. Want financial privacy for personal transactions? Switch to shielded addresses.
This flexibility is what’s kept Zcash accessible on major exchanges while competitors got delisted.
Ethereum’s privacy solutions are still evolving. Projects like Tornado Cash attempted to add privacy layers, but they faced legal challenges and technical limitations. The Zcash blockchain technology is built from the ground up for privacy.
Here’s my practical assessment after using these systems:
- Bitcoin: Best for transparency and widest acceptance, worst for privacy
- Monero: Maximum privacy but limited exchange availability and regulatory risk
- Zcash: Balanced approach with optional privacy and mainstream accessibility
- Ethereum privacy tools: Still experimental with uncertain regulatory status
The data backs up this positioning. Financial analysis shows that Zcash’s hybrid model has enabled continued listings on major platforms. Coinbase, Binance, Kraken, and other major exchanges still support it.
Meanwhile, exchanges in the United States and Europe dropped Monero due to regulatory concerns about mandatory privacy features.
That doesn’t mean Zcash’s approach is perfect. Some privacy advocates argue that optional privacy creates a smaller anonymity set. Fewer people using shielded transactions makes those transactions more notable.
It’s a valid concern, though shielded transaction usage has been growing steadily as wallets improve.
The Importance of Privacy in Cryptocurrency
I started researching Zcash private cryptocurrency expecting to find a tool for hiding illegal transactions. What I discovered challenged everything I thought about financial privacy. Privacy in digital finance isn’t about concealing wrongdoing—it’s about reclaiming a fundamental right.
Every credit card swipe, bank transfer, and digital payment creates a permanent record. These records sit in corporate databases, accessible to institutions, government agencies, and hackers. Financial surveillance has become the default state of modern commerce.
By 2026, the landscape has shifted considerably. Zero-knowledge identity startup Self raised $9 million in seed funding. This isn’t just venture capital chasing trends—it’s recognition that privacy is infrastructure, not a feature.
Why Users Choose Privacy Coins
People turn to privacy coins for reasons far more nuanced than mainstream media suggests. The motivations break down into distinct categories. Each has legitimate concerns about cryptocurrency privacy concerns in today’s hyperconnected world.
Individuals in oppressive regimes need financial freedom without government monitoring. I’ve read accounts from users where dissent can mean imprisonment. For them, privacy isn’t optional—it’s survival.
Businesses protecting competitive information represent another significant user base. Imagine competitors analyzing every supplier payment, salary disbursement, and strategic investment. That’s basic business intelligence anyone can access with public blockchain data.
Journalists and activists face real-world threats when their funding sources become public knowledge. Human rights organizations operating in dangerous regions can’t afford identified financial supporters. The risks extend beyond inconvenience into life-threatening territory.
Regular people simply value privacy as a principle. They’re not hiding anything illegal. They just don’t believe their morning coffee purchase should be permanently recorded.
Market data from 2026 shows growing alignment between compliance and cryptographic confidentiality. Regulatory shifts under pro-crypto policies have created favorable environments for privacy-enhancing innovations. Projects like BNY Mellon’s stablecoin fund demonstrate that institutional players recognize financial confidentiality as commercial necessity.
Risks of Public Transactions
The dangers of transparent blockchain transactions are more severe than most people realize. Bitcoin’s public ledger means identifying one address reveals your entire transaction history. This isn’t theoretical—it’s happening right now.
I’ve documented evidence of criminals using blockchain analysis to identify and target holders. Once they know you hold significant cryptocurrency, your physical security becomes compromised. Cases include home invasions, kidnappings, and coercion based on publicly available blockchain data.
The risks extend beyond physical threats. Financial profiling creates vulnerabilities most users never consider:
- Employer discrimination: Companies researching job candidates can analyze spending patterns and financial decisions
- Price manipulation: Sellers can adjust prices based on your visible wallet balance
- Relationship complications: Financial histories become ammunition in divorces, custody battles, and business disputes
- Identity correlation: Multiple transactions create patterns that can de-anonymize even careful users
Zcash’s shielded transactions directly address these cryptocurrency privacy concerns by encrypting payment details. The technology uses zero-knowledge proofs to verify transactions. It doesn’t reveal sender, receiver, or amount information.
The evidence supporting privacy needs has grown substantially by 2026. Institutional players acknowledge that financial confidentiality isn’t just a right—it’s a necessity. Privacy-preserving infrastructure has moved from fringe interest to mainstream requirement.
| Transaction Type | Information Exposed | Risk Level | Mitigation Available |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Bitcoin | Sender, receiver, amount, timestamp | High | Limited (mixing services) |
| Ethereum | Complete transaction history, smart contract interactions | Very High | Minimal |
| Zcash Transparent | Similar to Bitcoin | High | Optional shielding |
| Zcash Shielded | Only proof of validity | Low | Built-in encryption |
The privacy conversation has evolved beyond the criminal narrative. By 2026, legitimate businesses, institutional investors, and everyday users recognize transaction privacy as fundamental infrastructure. The question isn’t whether privacy matters—it’s how we implement it responsibly.
Overview of Shielded Transactions in Zcash
I’ve spent considerable time exploring how shielded transactions work in practice. The mechanics are both elegant and powerful. This technology shows where Zcash truly stands apart from transparent blockchains like Bitcoin or Ethereum.
The combination of cryptographic innovation and practical usability has evolved significantly through 2026. What makes these transactions special isn’t just the privacy. It’s how Zcash maintains blockchain integrity while completely obscuring transaction details.
The system validates everything without revealing anything. This sounds paradoxical until you understand the underlying architecture. By 2026, shielded transactions have moved from an advanced feature to the default experience for most users.
The growth trajectory tells an interesting story. Industry reports show shielded ZEC addresses now secure approximately 20-25% of Zcash’s circulating supply. That’s a substantial increase from earlier years, driven by improved infrastructure and user-friendly implementations.
Technical Details of Shielded Transactions
The encrypted transaction process relies on something called zk-SNARKs. These are zero-knowledge succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge. The concept is actually straightforward.
These cryptographic proofs let you prove you have the right to spend funds. They do this without revealing your balance, the recipient, or the amount being transferred.
You initiate Zcash anonymous transfers using shielded ZEC addresses, called Z-addresses. The protocol generates a mathematical proof. This proof demonstrates three things: you control the funds you’re spending, you have sufficient balance, and you’re authorized.
But here’s the crucial part—the blockchain records only that a valid transaction occurred. Nothing more.
The zk-SNARK implementation operates through several technical components that work together:
- Commitment schemes that hide transaction values while allowing verification
- Nullifiers that prevent double-spending without revealing which coins were spent
- Merkle trees that organize the shielded pool efficiently
- Viewing keys that allow selective disclosure when needed
The shielded pool functions as a cryptographic mixing environment. All encrypted transactions exist together. As this pool grows larger, the anonymity set expands.
This means there are more possible sources and destinations for any given transaction. Think of it like a crowd: privacy improves when more people are present.
Project Tachyon deserves specific attention because it addressed scalability concerns. These concerns previously limited adoption. Earlier versions of the encrypted transaction process could be slow—proof generation sometimes took minutes.
Project Tachyon has pushed transaction throughput capabilities toward thousands per second. This makes shielded operations practical for everyday use.
The technical specifications have evolved considerably:
| Feature | Early Implementation | 2026 Status | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Proof Generation Time | 40-90 seconds | 2-5 seconds | Enables real-time transactions |
| Transaction Throughput | 6-7 per second | Thousands per second (target) | Scales for mainstream adoption |
| Shielded Pool Size | 5-8% of supply | 20-25% of supply | Stronger anonymity guarantees |
| Hardware Requirements | Specialized computing needed | Standard devices supported | Accessibility for average users |
The Zashi wallet has played a transformative role in normalizing these features. By defaulting to shielded ZEC addresses, it makes Zcash anonymous transfers the path of least resistance. Users don’t need to understand zk-SNARK implementation to benefit from it.
The complexity is abstracted behind a clean interface.
Benefits of Using Shielded Transactions
Beyond the obvious privacy advantages, shielded transactions provide protections many users don’t initially consider. Transaction graph analysis becomes impossible when using the encrypted transaction process. This matters more than you might think.
In traditional transparent blockchains, sophisticated observers can build complete profiles of user behavior. They can identify spending patterns, income sources, savings balances, and business relationships. Shielded transactions eliminate this surveillance entirely.
The blockchain confirms validity without exposing the underlying economic activity.
I’ve noticed several practical use cases where this protection proves essential:
- Business operations: Companies can conduct confidential payroll without revealing employee compensation or organizational structure
- Commercial transactions: Buyers and sellers avoid front-running and price manipulation based on visible on-chain activity
- Personal security: Recipients aren’t exposed to unwanted attention from visible wealth accumulation
- Negotiation privacy: Parties can transact without revealing bargaining positions or financial capabilities
The user experience improvements have been dramatic. Early implementations required technical expertise and patience. I remember waiting several minutes for shielded transactions to process.
By 2026, the experience is nearly indistinguishable from transparent transactions in terms of speed. Most users never think about the cryptographic complexity happening behind the scenes.
Financial sovereignty represents another benefit that resonates with many users. You control shielded ZEC addresses and maintain genuinely private wealth. This wealth exists independently of third-party oversight.
This isn’t about hiding illegal activity. It’s about preserving the same financial privacy that cash historically provided.
The economic model supporting this infrastructure has stabilized well. Current ZEC emissions match Bitcoin’s 2016 levels at 12.5 coins per block. This happens approximately every 10 minutes.
The distribution allocates 80% to miners who secure the network. The remaining 20% splits between the Electric Coin Company (8%), Zcash Community Grants (7%), and Zcash Foundation (5%). This funding structure ensures continued development of the zk-SNARK implementation and related infrastructure.
From my perspective, the most significant benefit is how shielded transactions preserve the original vision of cryptocurrency. Peer-to-peer electronic cash that functions like physical currency. You wouldn’t want every cash transaction you make publicly recorded forever.
Zcash anonymous transfers extend that same courtesy to digital transactions. This feels like the natural evolution of money in the internet age.
Statistics on Zcash Use and Shielded Transactions
I started tracking Zcash adoption statistics in 2024. I didn’t expect the trajectory we’ve seen heading into 2026. The numbers tell a story that’s more compelling than typical crypto hype cycles.
We’re looking at actual adoption patterns. These patterns reveal how privacy features gain traction in the real world.
The Zcash market performance data from late 2025 through early 2026 shows something significant. This isn’t just about price movements—though those have been dramatic. It’s about what those numbers indicate regarding user confidence and institutional recognition.
Growth in Adoption Rates
The shielded pool growth represents the most meaningful metric I’ve tracked. Back in early 2024, roughly 10% of ZEC supply resided in shielded addresses. By 2026, that figure climbed to 20-25% of the circulating supply.
That doubling matters more than you might think. It demonstrates actual use of privacy features, not just speculative holding on exchanges. People are actively choosing to move their ZEC into shielded addresses.
The price trajectory captured everyone’s attention. ZEC climbed from $48 in late September 2025 to approximately $640 by November. This represented roughly 700% growth over two months.
As of October 2025, the price hit $227.44. It showed 148% weekly gains and a staggering 390% monthly surge.
Here’s what really caught my eye: Zcash’s market capitalization reached $6.22 billion. It surpassed Monero’s $6.04 billion. This marked the first time in seven years that ZEC overtook Monero in market valuation.
The supply dynamics provide context for these movements. With 16.26 million ZEC in circulation out of a 21 million maximum, the cryptocurrency maintains scarcity. This finite supply coupled with increasing adoption creates interesting market dynamics.
| Metric | September 2025 | October 2025 | November 2025 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price (USD) | $48 | $227.44 | $640 |
| Market Cap | $780 million | $3.7 billion | $6.22 billion |
| Shielded Pool % | 18% | 22% | 24% |
| 24h Volume | $120 million | $850 million | $1.43 billion |
Transaction Volume Analysis
The ZEC transaction volume tells a more nuanced story than price alone. The 24-hour trading volume reaching $1.43 billion demonstrates genuine liquidity in the market. This isn’t a thin order book where small trades create massive price swings.
High volume indicates institutional participation and serious capital allocation. Consistent volume above $1 billion daily signals major players view ZEC as legitimate. They see it as a privacy solution worth substantial investment.
Here’s an interesting pattern I’ve noticed: 85% of Zcash transactions still occur via transparent addresses. Only 15% use the shielded transaction features. At first glance, that seems disappointing for a privacy coin.
But dig deeper and you’ll find something fascinating. The average value of shielded transactions significantly exceeds that of transparent ones. Businesses and high-value users preferentially choose privacy for substantial transactions.
This usage pattern makes practical sense. Shielded transactions consume more computational resources and sometimes incur higher fees. Users optimize by applying privacy where it matters most—protecting significant financial movements.
The correlation between shielded pool growth and price appreciation reveals market sentiment. The market appears to value actual privacy adoption, not just theoretical capability.
These statistics fluctuate—crypto markets remain volatile by nature. But the directional trend throughout 2025 leading into 2026 has been remarkably consistent. The growth isn’t just speculative fervor; it’s backed by increasing real-world utilization.
Case Studies of Successful Shielded Transactions
The true test of privacy technology is how it performs in real use. I spent months researching documented Zcash privacy use cases. My findings challenge many assumptions about cryptocurrency privacy.
The most successful implementations remain appropriately confidential. This creates an interesting documentation challenge.
One pattern emerges clearly from my research. Privacy-preserving infrastructure growth requires institutional confidence and real capital deployment.
Institutional Adoption Signals
Franklin Templeton integrated its Benji platform into the Canton Network. This represents a watershed moment for encrypted ZEC payments. This isn’t a small experimental project.
Goldman Sachs, BNP Paribas, and Broadridge back this network. Their combined institutional weight signals mainstream acceptance.
QCP, a Singapore-based trading firm, accessed enhanced liquidity through this integration. The technical architecture shows major financial players building compatible infrastructure. They’re doing this with privacy-preserving technology at scale.
Self, a zero-knowledge identity startup, powers verification for Google and Aave. They raised $9 million in seed funding for privacy-focused infrastructure. This investment level signals sophisticated investors see real-world shielded transactions solving actual problems.
Documented Application Categories
I’ve identified several primary categories where encrypted ZEC payments provide measurable value. These come from community forums, public statements, and disclosed partnerships. These aren’t theoretical—they’re happening right now.
| Use Case Category | Primary Benefit | User Type | Privacy Risk Mitigated |
|---|---|---|---|
| Supply Chain Payments | Competitive intelligence protection | International businesses | Competitor analysis of supplier relationships |
| Nonprofit Operations | Donor protection | Organizations in restrictive regions | Government surveillance and donor exposure |
| Freelance Settlements | Financial privacy | Independent professionals | Income disclosure to clients and third parties |
| Trading Settlements | Position confidentiality | Financial firms | Market information leakage |
The supply chain application particularly caught my attention during research. International businesses use shielded addresses to prevent competitor analysis. This isn’t about hiding illegal activity—it’s about maintaining competitive advantages in transparent markets.
One disclosed case involved a trading firm using Zcash privacy use cases for settlement. The goal was preventing information leakage before trades fully executed.
User Perspectives on Privacy Value
User testimonials from public community forums reveal consistent themes. The overwhelming majority of real-world shielded transactions serve entirely legal purposes. Privacy provides practical benefits.
Privacy isn’t about hiding crime; it’s about maintaining fundamental rights in a world where financial surveillance has become normalized. Shielded transactions give me back control over who sees my financial life.
A content creator shared their experience receiving support from donors. These donors lived in countries where certain speech faces restrictions. Without transaction confidentiality, those donors risked exposure.
The shielded pool protected people exercising basic rights rather than facilitating anything illicit.
A freelance developer described how transparent blockchain payments created awkward dynamics. Clients could see exactly how much other clients paid. Encrypted ZEC payments solved this without requiring traditional banking intermediaries.
Non-profit organizations in authoritarian regions use shielded addresses to protect donor identities. One organization’s representative explained donor protection wasn’t optional. It was essential for operational security in their environment.
The Documentation Paradox
Successful privacy implementation by definition means limited public details. I can’t show you specific transaction IDs or wallet addresses. That would defeat the entire purpose.
What I can observe are measurable indicators. The shielded pool continues growing. Transaction counts increase quarter over quarter.
Institutional infrastructure development accelerates rather than slows. These patterns suggest widespread practical application. Specific Zcash privacy use cases remain appropriately confidential.
The absence of detailed public information isn’t a weakness. It’s confirmation the technology works as designed.
Tools for Managing Zcash Shielded Transactions
Choosing the wrong wallet for Zcash shielded transactions will make you abandon privacy features entirely. I’ve watched countless users give up on privacy because their Zcash wallet tools made the process unnecessarily complex. The good news? 2026 has brought genuine breakthroughs in usability that finally match the underlying cryptographic sophistication.
The tooling ecosystem determines whether privacy remains a niche feature or becomes mainstream. For years, Zcash suffered from this disconnect—brilliant technology hampered by clunky interfaces. That gap has narrowed considerably, and the available ZEC privacy tools now rival traditional cryptocurrency wallets in ease of use.
Wallets Supporting Shielded Transactions
The Zashi wallet has become the gold standard for mainstream users, and there’s a specific reason why. Developed by the Electric Coin Company, Zashi defaults to shielded addresses automatically. You don’t need to understand zero-knowledge proofs or make conscious privacy choices—the wallet handles it by design.
This default encryption approach has normalized privacy for regular users according to industry reports. Previous wallet designs required users to deliberately select shielded options, which felt intimidating. Zashi reverses this completely: privacy is automatic, transparency requires deliberate action.
The wallet supports both iOS and Android platforms with simplified backup processes and direct spending integrations. The Q4 2025 roadmap from the Electric Coin Company emphasized expanded shielded pools. Further usability improvements were specifically planned for Zashi.
Beyond Zashi, several alternatives offer different advantages for shielded address management:
| Wallet Name | Primary Strength | Platform Support | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zashi | Default privacy settings | iOS, Android | Mainstream users seeking simplicity |
| Ywallet | Advanced features and faster sync | iOS, Android, Desktop | Technical users wanting granular control |
| Nighthawk Wallet | Mobile-focused privacy | iOS, Android | Users prioritizing smartphone convenience |
| Zbay | Integrated encrypted messaging | Desktop | Users needing communication alongside transactions |
I personally prefer Ywallet for its advanced features and noticeably faster synchronization times. It handles large transaction histories more efficiently than alternatives. However, each wallet involves trade-offs between usability, features, and platform compatibility.
Understanding viewing keys becomes important for proper shielded address management. Zcash allows you to generate viewing keys that permit specific parties to see transaction details without granting spending authority. This proves useful for accounting purposes, regulatory compliance, or sharing information with trusted advisors.
The viewing key concept solves a genuine problem: how do you maintain privacy while still enabling selective transparency? You can show an auditor your transaction history without giving them access to your funds. That’s actually quite elegant from a design perspective.
Anonymity Tools and Mixers
Here’s where Zcash fundamentally differs from transparent cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. Bitcoin users often rely on external mixing services—third-party tools that shuffle transactions between multiple users. These mixers introduce trust assumptions and additional fees.
Zcash’s shielded pool functions as a built-in mixer by design. Your transaction becomes cryptographically indistinguishable from all other shielded transactions. The mathematics ensure this—it’s not dependent on the volume of other users mixing at the same time.
This represents one of Zcash’s strongest technical advantages over privacy tools requiring external services. You don’t need to trust a third-party mixing service or pay extra fees. The privacy mechanism is integral to the protocol itself.
Bitcoin mixing services have faced legal challenges and operational shutdowns. Users lost funds when certain mixers disappeared. Zcash sidesteps this entire category of risk because the “mixing” happens at the protocol level through zero-knowledge proofs.
Project Tachyon—an ongoing initiative—aims to boost transaction throughput to thousands per second. This scalability improvement will make ZEC privacy tools even more practical for everyday use. Higher throughput means faster confirmations without compromising the cryptographic privacy guarantees.
The maturation of these Zcash wallet tools addresses earlier criticisms that privacy required excessive technical knowledge. I remember explaining shielded addresses to interested users in 2020 and watching their eyes glaze over. The 2026 tooling landscape makes those conversations much simpler—sometimes as straightforward as “download Zashi and the rest happens automatically.”
One practical consideration: shielded transactions do require slightly more computational resources than transparent transactions. On mobile devices, this means marginally higher battery consumption and longer processing times. The difference has become negligible with recent optimizations, but it’s worth mentioning for users on older hardware.
The ecosystem still has room for improvement—particularly around hardware wallet integration for shielded addresses. Most hardware wallets support only transparent ZEC addresses, which defeats the privacy purpose. This remains a development priority as the technology matures.
Predictions for Zcash and Its Shielded Transactions
Predicting cryptocurrency markets feels like reading tea leaves. Certain trends suggest Zcash’s trajectory through 2026 carries both promise and peril. I’ve watched enough bull runs and crashes to know that specific price targets are usually wrong.
The underlying forces shaping the Zcash 2026 outlook tell a more reliable story. The question isn’t whether privacy becomes important in crypto. The real question is whether Zcash executes well enough to dominate that space.
Market Forecasts for 2026
The numbers from 2025 paint a dramatic picture. ZEC climbed from $48 to $640 by November—a 700% surge that caught optimistic holders off guard. Yahoo Finance data shows this wasn’t just random pump-and-dump action.
It coincided with institutional privacy infrastructure announcements and Canton Network activity expansion. But here’s what the ZEC price prediction enthusiasts often miss: the RSI hit 80. Markets that run this hot typically correct, sometimes violently.
Several converging trends suggest the privacy coin future favors Zcash despite volatility concerns. First, institutional adoption of privacy-preserving technologies is accelerating, not slowing. Traditional finance giants are committing serious capital and engineering resources.
Second, regulatory frameworks are evolving toward recognizing legitimate privacy needs. Zcash’s optional transparency model positions it favorably compared to fully anonymous alternatives. Having transparent options becomes a competitive advantage rather than a compromise.
Third, Project Tachyon addresses the scalability concerns that previously limited mainstream adoption. Shielded transactions can process thousands per second with sub-second confirmation times. The remaining barriers to everyday use largely disappear.
Some analysts project ZEC could reach $800-1000 if current adoption trends continue. I’m cautious about specific targets because markets stay irrational longer than any of us can remain solvent. But the fundamental thesis has strengthened, not weakened.
Industry reports position 2026 as the year privacy in crypto moves from theoretical promise to operational reality. Financial analysis indicates Zcash’s market share has already surpassed Monero’s, cementing its status as the leading privacy coin.
Potential Challenges Ahead
The Zcash challenges facing the network through 2026 are significant and deserve serious consideration. Regulatory risk remains the elephant in the room—actually, it’s more like a herd of elephants. Regulatory attitudes could shift quickly.
The EU’s MiCA framework and potential US legislation could impose requirements that even optional privacy struggles to meet. I’ve seen promising technologies get kneecapped by regulatory uncertainty before.
Technical challenges include maintaining security as transaction volume scales. The trusted setup for zk-SNARKs has improved with newer implementations. Competing privacy solutions on other chains are evolving rapidly.
Zcash needs to stay ahead of both privacy-focused competitors and privacy features being added to major cryptocurrencies. Market challenges present their own headwinds. The volatility evidenced by overbought RSI indicators suggests potential corrections ahead.
Zcash still correlates strongly with Bitcoin’s market cycles. Macro crypto sentiment impacts ZEC regardless of fundamentals. Competition is intensifying from multiple directions.
Privacy-focused chains like Monero and newer projects offer different trade-offs. Meanwhile, Ethereum and other major platforms are adding privacy features. These might satisfy users who don’t need maximum anonymity.
The prediction I’m most confident about regarding the privacy coin future: privacy in cryptocurrency is becoming infrastructure, not niche. Zcash specifically dominating that space depends on execution, regulatory navigation, and maintaining technical leadership. But the fundamental demand is real and growing.
Canton Network activity surging and institutional players committing resources suggests we’re past the “will privacy matter?” debate. Now we’re in the “who executes best?” phase. That’s actually a more favorable environment for projects with working technology and proven track records.
The Zcash 2026 outlook balances genuine opportunity against substantial risks. I expect continued volatility, regulatory battles, and competitive pressure. But I also expect privacy to transition from controversial feature to expected infrastructure.
Zcash is better positioned for that transition than most alternatives.
Frequently Asked Questions About Zcash Shielded Transactions
People keep asking me the same questions about Zcash shielded transactions. Let’s tackle them head-on. These aren’t abstract theoretical questions—they’re practical issues that affect whether someone will actually use shielded transactions.
Privacy features sound great in theory. But people want to know about costs, real-world security, and whether their transactions can truly remain private. Let me break down the answers based on both technical reality and practical experience.
What Are the Fees for Shielded Transactions?
This is probably the most practical question I hear. Shielded transaction fees on Zcash typically run around 0.0001 ZEC per transaction. That translates to less than a penny at current market rates.
The computational work required for shielded transactions is slightly higher than transparent ones. Your wallet needs to generate cryptographic proofs. But here’s what matters: you don’t notice the difference in fees.
These fees go to miners as part of the blockchain’s economic incentive structure. According to recent market data, Zcash maintains a circulating supply of 16.26 million out of 21 million maximum. Block rewards currently sit at 12.5 ZEC per 10 minutes.
Compare this to other networks during congestion periods:
- Bitcoin fees can exceed $10-20 during network congestion
- Ethereum gas fees regularly spike into double or triple digits for complex transactions
- Even Bitcoin Lightning Network requires channel opening fees that dwarf Zcash costs
- Privacy-focused mixing services often charge 1-3% of transaction value
The consistency of shielded transaction fees matters for adoption. Privacy shouldn’t be a luxury that only makes sense for large transfers. With Zcash, you can make small transactions without worrying about fees eating into your value.
How Secure Are Shielded Transactions?
This question has multiple layers worth examining. Cryptographically, zk-SNARKs have been extensively peer-reviewed by academic cryptographers since Zcash’s launch in 2016. No practical attacks have compromised the privacy of shielded transactions in nearly a decade of real-world use.
The mathematics underlying zero-knowledge proofs is considered sound by the cryptographic community. We’re talking about techniques that allow you to prove something is true without revealing why it’s true. That’s powerful stuff, and it’s been battle-tested.
ZEC security concerns that do exist relate to different aspects of the system:
| Security Aspect | Risk Level | Mitigation Strategy | User Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Core Cryptography | Very Low | Peer-reviewed academic protocols | Mathematical privacy guarantees |
| Wallet Implementation | Low-Medium | Use established, audited wallets | Choose reputable software |
| User Error | Medium | Education and best practices | Avoid mixing transparent and shielded carelessly |
| Trusted Setup | Low | Multiple ceremonies with distributed trust | Confidence in system initialization |
The trusted setup ceremony deserves special mention. Zcash has conducted multiple rounds with increasing security measures and distributed participation. While this remains a theoretical concern for some cryptographers, the practical implementation has been thorough.
In my experience, Zcash blockchain privacy represents cryptographic security comparable to any system currently deployed in production. The technology isn’t experimental anymore—it’s proven.
Can Shielded Transactions Be Traced?
Here’s the core question everyone really wants answered. If used properly, shielded transactions cannot be traced using blockchain analysis techniques. This isn’t marketing hype—it’s mathematical reality.
Unlike Bitcoin mixing or CoinJoin protocols, zk-SNARKs provide mathematical privacy. Observers can verify that a valid transaction occurred, but they cannot determine sender, receiver, or amount. The proof confirms validity without revealing details.
The critical caveat is “if used properly.” Transaction traceability concerns arise from user behavior patterns, not cryptographic weaknesses. Sending funds from a transparent address to a shielded one, then immediately to another transparent address, can leak information.
Best practices for maintaining privacy include:
- Keep funds in the shielded pool rather than constantly moving between transparent and shielded addresses
- Avoid patterns that correlate transparent and shielded activity through timing or amounts
- Understand that privacy is a practice, not just a feature you switch on once
- Use shielded addresses as your default receiving address
The difference between Zcash and mixing services is fundamental. Mixers rely on obscurity—they shuffle coins among users hoping to break the trail. Shielded transactions use mathematics to make the trail impossible to follow.
I’ve seen people worry about government tracking or advanced blockchain forensics compromising their shielded transactions. The reality is that the cryptography protecting shielded transactions is stronger than the encryption protecting most government communications. Breaking zk-SNARKs would require computational capabilities that don’t currently exist.
That said, privacy isn’t binary. Metadata can still leak information if you’re not careful. Your IP address when broadcasting transactions, exchange records when converting to fiat, and behavioral patterns all exist outside the blockchain itself.
Zcash protects the on-chain transaction data completely. But operational security matters too.
Evidence Supporting the Effectiveness of Shielded Transactions
Evidence matters more than promises, especially with privacy technology you can’t easily verify yourself. I’ve looked at the actual research on Zcash’s shielded transactions rather than just marketing claims. What I found was surprisingly solid—there’s real academic work and practical testing backing up the privacy claims.
The challenge with privacy technology is that you can’t just look at your transaction and see if it’s private. You need independent verification from researchers who understand cryptography.
Academic Research and Cryptographic Validation
The foundation of Zcash privacy research starts with zk-SNARKs—the cryptographic method that makes shielded transactions possible. These weren’t invented by Zcash; they came from academic researchers at institutions like MIT, Technion, and Tel Aviv University. The peer review process for these cryptographic proofs was extensive.
What’s significant about zk-SNARK effectiveness is what hasn’t happened since Zcash launched in 2016. Despite substantial incentives—both academic reputation and potential exploit value—no practical attacks have compromised properly implemented shielded transactions. That’s nearly a decade of security researchers trying to find flaws.
According to Cryptoslate, Zcash’s Electric Coin Company rolled out a Q4 2025 roadmap emphasizing privacy enhancements. This included expanded shielded pools and usability improvements, showing continued development based on research findings.
The academic community has published multiple papers analyzing blockchain analysis resistance across different cryptocurrencies. These studies reveal stark differences in how various privacy approaches hold up under scrutiny.
Comparative Analysis: How Different Privacy Models Perform
Comparing shielded vs transparent transactions reveals clear differences. I’ve reviewed several research papers that attempted to trace cryptocurrency movements across networks. The results tell an interesting story.
Bitcoin transactions can be analyzed through clustering techniques, timing correlation, and exchange connection patterns. Multiple academic papers demonstrated the ability to de-anonymize Bitcoin users with surprisingly high confidence. The transparent blockchain provides too much information.
Monero offers better privacy but has some documented vulnerabilities. Research identified potential issues with transaction amounts and timing analysis. Under certain circumstances, these could reduce anonymity guarantees.
Zcash shielded transactions resist these analysis techniques when users engage the privacy features properly. The encrypted nature of the shielded pool prevents the data gathering that makes other analysis methods possible. Researchers can’t analyze what they can’t see.
Here’s what the research shows about different privacy approaches:
- Bitcoin: Fully traceable with blockchain analysis tools, clustering reveals transaction patterns
- Monero: Strong privacy but vulnerable to statistical analysis in some scenarios
- Zcash transparent: Identical to Bitcoin in terms of traceability and analysis
- Zcash shielded: Cryptographically protected, resists known analysis techniques
The comparison between shielded and transparent Zcash transactions provides valuable validation. Transparent transactions function exactly like Bitcoin—fully analyzable and traceable. This creates a control group demonstrating that Zcash’s infrastructure works reliably while offering genuinely different characteristics for shielded use.
Real-world evidence extends beyond academic papers. Financial analysis shows Zcash retained listings on major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase while Monero faced delistings in several jurisdictions. This suggests the optional privacy model meets compliance requirements while maintaining cryptographic privacy.
The regulatory treatment provides practical validation. Exchange compliance officers and regulators view Zcash’s approach differently than mandatory anonymity systems. This acceptance supports the technical claim that shielded transactions provide user privacy without preventing appropriate oversight mechanisms.
Industry reports indicate that approximately 20-25% of Zcash supply remains in the shielded pool. Users voluntarily choose this option despite it requiring slightly more effort and computation. The fact that people opt into privacy features suggests the protection provided is real and valued.
What convinced me most wasn’t any single study—it was the consistency across multiple sources. Academic cryptographers validate the underlying math. Blockchain analysts confirm they can’t trace shielded transactions.
Regulatory bodies accept the compliance balance. Users demonstrate preference through actual usage.
The evidence supporting blockchain analysis resistance isn’t just theoretical. It’s been tested by motivated adversaries for years without successful compromise of properly used shielded transactions.
Zcash and Regulatory Considerations
Regulatory considerations determine whether privacy coins like Zcash can thrive in coming years. The difference between survival and extinction often comes down to design choices made years earlier. Exchanges delisted certain privacy coins while maintaining support for others.
Zcash’s optional privacy model positions it well within evolving privacy coin regulations. The regulatory environment shifts toward frameworks that accommodate privacy within compliance structures. Recent financial analysis shows regulatory tailwinds amplifying privacy coin trends.
The Trump administration’s pro-crypto policies create favorable environments for privacy-enhancing innovations. The distinction between mandatory and optional privacy became the dividing line for regulatory acceptance. This reality reflects in exchange listings, banking relationships, and institutional adoption patterns.
Legal Status of Privacy Coins in the U.S.
The Zcash legal status in the United States exists in a functional gray area that’s gradually becoming clearer. As of 2026, privacy coins aren’t illegal in America. There’s no blanket prohibition on owning, trading, or using Zcash.
However, U.S. crypto laws create indirect pressure through exchanges, banks, and service providers rather than targeting users directly. Key regulatory concerns center on anti-money laundering requirements and know-your-customer protocols. These fall under the Bank Secrecy Act and PATRIOT Act.
Regulators want assurance that financial transactions can be monitored for illicit activity when necessary. Monero’s mandatory privacy makes compliance nearly impossible. You literally cannot disclose transaction details because they’re cryptographically hidden from everyone.
This design choice led to widespread exchange delistings and banking restrictions. Cryptoslate reports that Zcash navigated regulatory scrutiny more effectively than Monero by offering optional privacy. This enabled retention of listings on major exchanges like Binance and Coinbase.
The GENIUS Act provides federal oversight of stablecoin reserves, representing the broader regulatory trend toward clearer frameworks. While this legislation focuses on stablecoins rather than privacy coins specifically, it signals regulators’ willingness. They’re creating legitimate spaces for privacy within compliance structures.
This approach benefits Zcash’s positioning significantly. Privacy coin regulations operate through practical enforcement mechanisms rather than outright bans. Exchanges implement policies, banks establish risk frameworks, and compliance officers make determinations about acceptable technologies.
Zcash’s optional transparency passes these practical tests where mandatory privacy fails.
Compliance with Regulations
Cryptocurrency compliance under Zcash’s model looks fundamentally different from traditional transparent blockchains or fully private alternatives. The system works through multiple layers that balance privacy with regulatory requirements. Exchanges collect KYC information from users and often require withdrawals to transparent addresses or implement transaction monitoring.
Businesses can maintain records through viewing keys for tax and audit purposes. This doesn’t compromise the general privacy of the shielded pool. Users retain the option to disclose specific transactions when legally required.
This flexibility represents Zcash’s strategic advantage. Industry reports indicate regulators in the EU and U.S. increasingly target cryptocurrencies that cannot comply. Zcash’s optional transparency model allows institutions to selectively disclose transaction data, aligning with compliance frameworks.
The viewing key functionality enables compliance on demand—privacy by default with disclosure when necessary. International regulatory landscapes vary considerably. Switzerland’s FINMA regulations have taken a relatively accommodating approach to privacy-preserving technologies when combined with appropriate controls.
Canada’s DASP licensing and Switzerland’s regulatory framework position these jurisdictions as hubs for privacy-focused crypto firms. The EU’s MiCA framework is more restrictive but doesn’t prohibit privacy coins outright. Cryptocurrency compliance continues evolving as regulators gain sophistication.
Zcash’s regulatory treatment continues improving because it offers privacy without completely closing off visibility. That balance appears acceptable to regulators in ways that Monero’s approach isn’t.
| Jurisdiction | Regulatory Framework | Privacy Coin Stance | Compliance Requirements |
|---|---|---|---|
| United States | Bank Secrecy Act, PATRIOT Act, GENIUS Act | No blanket ban; indirect pressure through exchanges | AML/KYC at exchange level; selective disclosure acceptable |
| European Union | MiCA (Markets in Crypto-Assets) | Restrictive but not prohibitive | Strict AML requirements; optional privacy permitted |
| Switzerland | FINMA regulations | Accommodating with controls | Privacy allowed within compliance frameworks |
| Canada | DASP licensing | Supportive of privacy innovation | Licensing requirements; transparency options required |
The table above illustrates how different jurisdictions approach privacy coin regulations with varying levels of restriction and accommodation. What stands out is that no major jurisdiction has implemented complete bans. Instead, they’ve created compliance pathways that favor Zcash’s architecture.
Looking forward, the regulatory trajectory appears to favor privacy technologies that can demonstrate compliance capabilities. Zcash’s optional shielding, viewing keys, and selective disclosure features position it well within this evolving landscape. The technology demonstrates that privacy and compliance aren’t mutually exclusive—they’re design choices that can coexist.
Community and Development Updates for Zcash
Behind-the-scenes Zcash development reveals more about its future than any price prediction. The technical roadmap shows whether this project can execute on ambitious privacy goals. I’ve followed these updates throughout 2025, and the changes signal real maturity.
Development has shifted from theory to concrete implementations. Privacy coins face unique challenges with regulations, performance, and real-world usability.
Recent Developments in Zcash Technology
The Q4 2025 ZEC roadmap emphasized two critical areas: privacy enhancements and performance scalability. These represent fundamental improvements to shielded transactions.
Project Tachyon stands out as the most ambitious technical initiative. The goal? Increasing transaction throughput to thousands per second. This involves specific improvements to proof generation and network architecture.
Privacy technologies have historically suffered from performance penalties. Shielded transactions take longer and cost more computational resources. If Project Tachyon succeeds, that barrier largely disappears.
The technical approach optimizes the zero-knowledge proof system itself. Current implementations process proofs sequentially, but new architecture enables parallel processing. Early testing shows promising results.
The Zashi wallet improvements deserve attention. Making privacy default rather than optional has already increased shielded pool usage. The continued UX refinements focus on three areas:
- Cross-platform compatibility for seamless use across devices
- Improved backup and recovery mechanisms that don’t compromise privacy
- Integration with payment processors for practical merchant adoption
These features convert a technology demonstration into a practical tool. I’ve tested the updated Zashi wallet. The experience genuinely feels more intuitive than previous versions.
The expanded shielded pools initiative tackles a different problem. Current shielded pools are fragmented, making transactions between address types complex. Unifying these pools improves both usability and privacy.
Zcash development priorities include resistance to future threats. Quantum computing poses theoretical risks to current cryptographic systems. Research into post-quantum cryptography demonstrates forward-thinking planning.
Community Engagement and Support
Zcash operates through a unique funding model. Twenty percent of block rewards go directly to development and community initiatives. This creates sustainable funding without external investment.
The distribution follows a specific structure designed to balance efficiency with decentralized governance:
| Organization | Block Reward % | Primary Focus | Governance Structure |
|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Coin Company | 8% | Core protocol development and infrastructure maintenance | Company-led with community input |
| Zcash Community Grants | 7% | Third-party developers, researchers, and community initiatives | Application-based with transparent review |
| Zcash Foundation | 5% | Protocol governance and ecosystem development | Non-profit with decentralization emphasis |
| Miners | 80% | Network security and transaction processing | Market-driven participation |
This funding structure ensures consistent resources regardless of market conditions. The project doesn’t face funding crises that plague volunteer initiatives.
The drawback? It somewhat centralizes development around these funded entities. However, this has gradually shifted toward greater community participation throughout 2025.
The Zcash Community Grants program funds external innovation. Developers can propose projects that advance the ecosystem. This creates diversity in development approaches.
Community discussion happens through the Zcash Community Forum and developer calls. The forum provides transparent records of governance decisions and technical debates. Real decisions get made through these channels.
Increased participation from institutional players stood out most. Throughout 2025, more sophisticated questions came from entities representing serious business interests. This suggests growing institutional attention—particularly given the Cypherpunk backing that brought credibility.
The Zcash Foundation’s role in maintaining decentralization deserves mention. They prioritize long-term governance structures reducing dependence on any single entity. This includes research into voting mechanisms and protocol upgrade processes.
Support channels have improved significantly. Documentation has become more accessible with practical guides. For someone trying to actually use shielded transactions, this makes a substantial difference.
The community’s response to regulatory discussions has been measured. Rather than panic or defiant rejection, Zcash engages seriously with compliance questions. This balanced approach increases the likelihood of sustainable development.
Conclusion: The Future of Zcash and Privacy
After examining Zcash’s technology and market position, I see 2026 as crucial for privacy cryptocurrency adoption. The data reveals a compelling story about this digital asset’s growth. Zcash (ZEC) shielded transactions now represent 20-25% of circulating supply.
The project’s market cap has reached $6.22 billion, surpassing Monero as the leading privacy coin.
Where Zcash Stands Today
The technology works. That’s the bottom line I keep returning to. zk-SNARKs provide cryptographically sound privacy that’s been tested since 2016.
The optional privacy model lets users choose between transparent and shielded transactions. This approach has proven strategically smart for regulatory compliance while preserving genuine privacy.
Industry reports position 2026 as the year privacy moves from theoretical promise to operational reality. Canton Network activity is surging. Project Tachyon continues pushing technical boundaries.
Institutional adoption is accelerating.
Looking at the Path Ahead
The future of crypto privacy isn’t guaranteed, but Zcash’s ZEC long-term outlook appears stronger than most projects. Financial privacy matters more as surveillance capabilities expand and more activity moves on-chain.
The risks are real—regulatory changes, technical challenges, competing solutions. But fundamentally, shielded transactions solve a genuine problem in a technically sound way.
This isn’t investment advice. Do your own research before making financial decisions. But if privacy-preserving technology interests you, Zcash deserves attention through 2026 and beyond.
FAQ
What are the fees for shielded transactions on Zcash?
How secure are Zcash shielded transactions?
Can shielded transactions be traced?
What’s the difference between transparent and shielded Zcash addresses?
Which wallets support Zcash shielded transactions?
Are privacy coins like Zcash legal in the United States?
How does Zcash compare to Monero for privacy?
What percentage of Zcash transactions use shielded addresses?
Do I need special hardware to use Zcash shielded transactions?
Can businesses use Zcash for legitimate purposes?
What is zk-SNARKs technology and why does it matter?
How does Zcash’s shielded pool work?
What are the main risks of using Zcash shielded transactions?
Can government agencies trace Zcash shielded transactions?
How does Zcash handle scalability with shielded transactions?
