Glassnode: XRP Structure Echoes April 2022 Setup

Robert Harris
February 3, 2026
1 Views
analyst-studies-xrp-chart-with-realized-price-and-cost-basis-clusters-on-monitors

If you’ve been watching XRP lately, you’ve probably felt that familiar mix of “this looks ready” and “this could whip both ways.” Glassnode just added fuel to that feeling by saying XRP’s market structure looks “very similar” to April 2022. That’s not a price prediction. It’s more like a map of who’s holding, who’s underwater, and where pressure tends to build when the crowd’s cost basis clusters in certain places.

Here’s how to read that comment like an investor (not a headline-chaser), what actually happened after April 2022, and the on-chain and chart levels you can watch now. If you want real-time XRP context alongside broader market updates, you can also keep an eye on the XRP coverage at Cryptsy, which tends to pair price action with the kind of on-chain framing Glassnode is talking about.

Key Takeaways

  • Glassnode says XRP market structure is “very similar” to April 2022, meaning today’s holder cost basis and profit/loss positioning could amplify reactions around key levels without guaranteeing the same outcome.
  • Use realized price as a “decision zone” for XRP: sustained acceptance above it often reduces selling pressure, while repeated rejection near it can trigger break-even selling.
  • Track short-term vs long-term holder cohorts because a swollen short-term cost basis near current price can compress decisions into a tight band and produce sharper XRP moves.
  • Watch cost-basis distribution for “top-heavy” risk, since large clusters of underwater supply above spot can create overhead resistance as price revisits those entries.
  • Confirm on-chain signals with chart behavior by focusing on repeated tests of range highs/lows, and only trusting breakouts that hold with strong volume and momentum.
  • Factor in macro and headlines because Bitcoin liquidity regimes and XRP regulatory or ETF narrative shifts can override an otherwise clean XRP market structure setup, so define invalidation points to avoid overtrading.

What Glassnode Means By “Market Structure” In XRP

Analyst studies XRP realized price and holder cohorts on dual monitors.

When Glassnode talks about “market structure,” they’re usually not talking about candlestick patterns or a tidy set of trendlines. They mean the structure of holders: where different groups bought, what their average cost is, how much supply sits in profit or loss, and how close spot price is to those shared “break-even” zones.

That matters because crypto doesn’t move on vibes alone. It moves when people feel pressure to act. A holder near break-even behaves differently than one sitting on a 200% gain, or a 40% drawdown.

Realized Price And Cost Basis: The Core Concept

Think of realized price as a living estimate of the market’s average cost basis. It’s not perfect, but it’s useful: on-chain data looks at when coins last moved and treats that as a rough “paid price.” Add it up across the network and you get a sense of where the crowd’s break-even sits.

In practice, when XRP trades near realized price, you’re often in a high-tension area. You’ll see two impulses fight it out:

Price above realized price tends to make holders more patient. People feel like “I’m up, I can wait.”

Price below realized price tends to make people edgy. Some hold on, some cut, and any bounce back toward break-even can turn into selling pressure.

That’s why Glassnode’s “structure” comments can be more valuable than another “XRP to $X” prediction. They’re pointing at where the crowd’s pain and relief buttons are.

Short-Term Vs Long-Term Holder Cohorts And Why They Matter

Glassnode also tends to split holders into cohorts, often short-term holders (STH) and long-term holders (LTH). The exact cutoff varies by dataset, but the idea is consistent: newer buyers behave differently than seasoned holders.

Short-term holders are more reactive. They’re more likely to sell quickly if price chops around their entry.

Long-term holders are usually slower to move. They might sell into major strength, or they might only capitulate when stress is prolonged.

If XRP’s structure “looks like April 2022,” part of that similarity usually comes from how much supply is controlled by these different cohorts and where their average cost sits. When short-term supply swells near a key cost basis level, you get sharper moves because decision-making compresses into a narrow price band.

Why April 2022 Is The Key Comparison Point

April 2022 is a useful reference because it wasn’t a clean bull run or a clean bear market moment. It was one of those periods where structure and psychology mattered a lot, and where broader market stress ended up steering the wheel.

To make Glassnode’s comparison useful to you, treat April 2022 as a “case study” in how XRP tends to behave when cost basis levels tighten and macro pressure rises.

What Happened To XRP After April 2022

After April 2022, the crypto market rolled into a nasty risk-off phase. Liquidity tightened, big players de-risked, and correlations across crypto jumped. XRP didn’t trade in isolation.

The practical takeaway is this: even if XRP’s internal holder structure looked primed for a move, the broader tape still mattered more than most people wanted to admit. You can have a setup that looks constructive on-chain, but if the market is dumping and liquidity is leaving, follow-through gets harder.

If you remember the feel of 2022, you probably remember how rallies often looked “real” for a few days and then faded. That’s the trap structure comparisons can hint at: not “it will repeat,” but “the same fault lines are in place.”

Which Conditions Are Similar Now, and Which Aren’t

The similarity Glassnode is pointing to is likely structural: XRP hovering around important cost basis zones, cohorts positioned in a way that makes price sensitive to small pushes, and profitability metrics sitting near a pivot.

But it’s not a carbon copy.

For one, market plumbing changes. Liquidity conditions, stablecoin flows, and the way major exchanges handle risk aren’t identical to 2022.

Also, the narrative layer is different. XRP is unusually headline-sensitive because of the regulatory backdrop. In my experience, that means your clean “structure thesis” can get blown up by a single court-related headline, an exchange listing change, or a sudden shift in how traders price regulatory risk.

So yes, April 2022 can be a valuable mirror. Just don’t treat it like destiny.

The On-Chain Signals To Watch Right Now

If you want to actually act on Glassnode-style analysis, you need a short watchlist of signals that tend to matter most when price is near a shared cost basis. Otherwise you end up staring at twenty dashboards and still not knowing what to do.

Realized Price Proximity And The “Decision Zone” Effect

When spot price sits near realized price (or a major cohort’s realized price), you’re in what I call a decision zone. It’s the area where conviction gets tested.

If XRP holds above a key realized price level for long enough, sellers often dry up because holders feel “safe” again.

If XRP fails repeatedly near that level, you’ll often see rejection-driven selling: people who waited for break-even finally get their chance and take it.

What you’re watching for isn’t a single wick above or below. You’re watching for acceptance, days of trading that show the market is comfortable on one side of that line.

Profitability Metrics: Supply In Profit/Loss And MVRV-Like Readings

Profitability metrics tell you how crowded a trade is.

If a large share of supply is in profit, you can get two outcomes that sound contradictory but both happen in real markets: holders feel confident and refuse to sell (supportive), or they take profit quickly at the first sign of weakness (fragile).

If a large share of supply is in loss, selling can get exhausted (bullish for a bounce), but rallies can also slam into overhead supply as underwater holders sell into strength.

Metrics like MVRV (market value to realized value) try to summarize that tension. You don’t need to worship the number. You just want to know whether you’re in a zone where the average holder feels rich, fine, or stressed.

Cost-Basis Distribution And “Top-Heavy” Holder Risk

Cost-basis distribution is one of the more practical tools when you’re trying to estimate where resistance might form.

If a lot of XRP supply last moved at higher prices than current spot, you can get a “top-heavy” setup: a thick band of holders above price who may sell when price comes back to their entry. That creates overhead friction.

On the flip side, if supply is clustered below current price, dips can get bought because more holders are sitting in profit and are less desperate to exit.

This is also where you want to be honest about timeframes. A cost-basis cluster can act like resistance for weeks, not hours. If you’re trading too tightly around it, you’ll feel like you’re always early or always wrong, even when your read is directionally fine.

Price Levels And Technical Structure Traders Are Reacting To

On-chain structure tells you where stress might live. Chart structure tells you where traders are actually placing bets today.

And whether you like technical analysis or not, it matters because enough capital reacts to the same obvious areas that those areas become self-fulfilling, at least for a while.

Key Support/Resistance Zones And Why They’re Psychological

The most important zones are usually the boring ones: prior range highs, prior range lows, and big round numbers.

If XRP has spent weeks chopping inside a range, the range edges become emotional. Buyers remember getting “a deal” near the lows. Sellers remember getting trapped near the highs.

In my experience, you’ll get the cleanest information when price revisits a level for the third or fourth time. The first touch is often noise. Repeated tests tell you whether the market is absorbing supply or getting thinner.

Also watch how XRP behaves around levels where volume previously exploded. Those are the spots where the most people made decisions, which means they’re the spots most people will react to again.

Volume, Momentum, And Trend Confirmation Triggers

Price alone can lie. You need confirmation.

If XRP breaks above a key level but volume is flat and momentum fades quickly, that’s often a sign of a stop-run rather than real demand.

If XRP breaks a level and then holds it while volume stays elevated, that’s a different story. That’s acceptance.

Momentum indicators aren’t magic, but they can help you avoid the worst habit in crypto: chasing a green candle that’s already out of fuel. What you really want is a move that keeps attracting follow-through buyers after the initial push.

Catalysts And Macro Variables That Can Override The Setup

This is the part that saves you money: admitting the “perfect setup” can still fail for reasons that have nothing to do with XRP.

Bitcoin And Marketwide Liquidity: Correlation And Risk-On/Risk-Off Regimes

Most of the time, XRP trades in the same weather system as Bitcoin.

When liquidity is flowing into crypto, correlations rise and altcoins get pulled along.

When liquidity is leaving, correlations also rise, just in the worst way.

So if you’re building a plan around XRP’s market structure, you should also keep one eye on Bitcoin’s trend and one eye on liquidity signals like stablecoin supply behavior and broad risk appetite. You don’t need a macro PhD. You just need to recognize the regime: is the market rewarding risk, or punishing it?

And yes, XRP can have its own bursts when headlines hit. But even then, the follow-through often depends on whether the wider market is willing to hold risk overnight.

Regulatory And ETF Narrative Shifts: Headline-Driven Volatility

XRP is uniquely exposed to regulatory headlines. That’s not a moral judgment: it’s just the tape.

A single narrative shift can change positioning fast: traders hedge, market makers widen spreads, and what looked like a calm structure suddenly trades like a spring.

ETF-related narratives can also change how traders price the whole sector. Even if an ETF headline isn’t “about XRP,” it can shift sentiment and liquidity across majors and large-cap alts.

If you’re reading Glassnode’s structure call, your job is to keep a mental asterisk next to it: structure is slow: headlines are fast. Plan for both.

How To Use This Information Without Overtrading

The biggest mistake I see smart investors make with on-chain data is turning it into a reason to trade every twitch. On-chain is best as a context tool. It helps you pick your spots and size your risk, not click buttons all day.

Bull, Base, And Bear Scenarios With Actionable Signals

Here’s a practical way to turn the “April 2022-like structure” idea into a plan you can actually follow.

A bull scenario is when XRP reclaims and holds key cost basis levels, and you see acceptance on the chart, breaks that hold, not just spikes. In that case, your focus shifts to whether profitability metrics are rising in a healthy way, not jumping to euphoric extremes overnight.

A base scenario is when XRP chops around realized price and important range levels without clean direction. This is where most people burn themselves out. If you’re not a short-term trader with a tested system, the base scenario is often a “do less” environment: wait for acceptance or rejection to become obvious.

A bear scenario is when XRP can’t hold key cost basis levels, bounces get sold quickly, and broader market conditions turn risk-off. In that case, the most valuable signal isn’t a fancy metric, it’s repeated failure to reclaim levels that used to act as support.

Risk Management For Investors Vs Active Traders

If you’re investing, your edge usually comes from patience and position sizing, not perfect entries. You can use Glassnode-style structure as a sanity check: are you buying into a zone where the average holder is stressed and selling might be exhausted, or are you buying into a zone where overhead supply is thick?

If you’re trading, you need cleaner rules. Decide ahead of time what “invalidates” your idea, on-chain, on the chart, or both. And be honest about volatility. XRP can move hard in minutes. If your risk plan assumes polite price action, it won’t survive contact with the real market.

One more thing I’ve found helpful: pick one or two structure metrics and stick with them for a full cycle. Jumping between indicators mid-trade is how you talk yourself into anything.

Conclusion

When Glassnode says XRP’s market structure looks a lot like April 2022, you should hear: “pay attention to cost basis and holder pressure, because small moves could matter.” You shouldn’t hear: “history will repeat perfectly.”

If you want to treat this like a pro, watch how XRP behaves around realized price and major cost-basis clusters, then match that with what the chart is saying about acceptance at key levels. And keep your eyes open for the two forces that can overpower any setup: Bitcoin-driven liquidity swings and XRP-specific regulatory headlines.

If you stay disciplined, fewer signals, clearer invalidation points, and no need to trade every candle, you’ll get the benefit of on-chain context without letting it drag you into overtrading. That’s the real edge.

XRP Market Structure FAQ

What does “XRP market structure” mean in Glassnode’s analysis?

In Glassnode terms, XRP market structure is about holder positioning—where different cohorts bought, their average cost basis, and how much supply sits in profit or loss. This helps identify “pressure points” near shared break-even levels where small price moves can trigger outsized buying or selling.

Why does Glassnode say XRP market structure is “very similar” to April 2022?

The comparison points to similar holder and cost-basis dynamics: XRP trading near key realized-price zones, profitability near a pivot, and cohorts positioned so price becomes sensitive in a tight band. It’s not a forecast—more a warning that the same structural “fault lines” may be present again.

What happened to XRP after April 2022, and why does it matter now?

After April 2022, crypto entered a risk-off phase—liquidity tightened, correlations rose, and rallies often faded. The lesson is that XRP’s on-chain setup can look constructive, but broader market conditions can still overpower it. Structure can hint at fragility without guaranteeing a repeat.

How does realized price create a “decision zone” for XRP traders and investors?

Realized price approximates the network’s average cost basis, so XRP trading near it often becomes a high-tension area. Holding above can reduce selling as holders feel “safe,” while repeated failures can spark break-even selling. Look for multi-day acceptance, not one-off wicks.

What on-chain metrics should I watch for XRP besides price?

Key XRP on-chain signals include realized price proximity, supply in profit/loss, MVRV-like profitability readings, and cost-basis distribution. These show whether holders feel confident or stressed and where overhead supply may form resistance. Use a small, consistent watchlist to avoid overtrading.

Can regulatory headlines or Bitcoin liquidity override XRP market structure signals?

Yes. XRP is unusually headline-sensitive, so sudden regulatory or listing news can shift positioning fast. Bitcoin-driven liquidity regimes also matter: in risk-off conditions, correlations rise and follow-through gets harder. Treat structure as slow-moving context, and headlines/liquidity as fast-moving overrides.

Author Robert Harris